Dodge Neon MPG by year — every rating on record
The Dodge Neon has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 8 model years, from 1995 to 2002. Across those years its best rated version returned 29 mpg (1997) and its thirstiest returned 24 mpg (1998). The EPA record holds 16 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Compact Cars.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 2 | 28 mpg | 26 mpg | #4 of 60 (95th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
| 1996 | 2 | 28 mpg | 25 mpg | #9 of 52 (84th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
| 1997 | 2 | 29 mpg | 25 mpg | #4 of 46 (93th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
| 1998 | 2 | 29 mpg | 24 mpg | #5 of 47 (91th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
| 1999 | 2 | 28 mpg | 24 mpg | #8 of 50 (86th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
| 2000 | 2 | 27 mpg | 24 mpg | #8 of 50 (86th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
| 2001 | 2 | 26 mpg | 24 mpg | #15 of 62 (77th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
| 2002 | 2 | 27 mpg | 24 mpg | #12 of 64 (83th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Dodge Neon placed highest in 1995 at #4 of 60, and lowest in 2001 at #15 of 62. It spent 8 of its 8 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 16 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 21 | 29 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 370.2916666666667 | n/a |
| 2002 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 31 | 27 | 425.9 | 11.0 | $2,300 | 329.14814814814815 | n/a |
| 2001 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 21 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 370.2916666666667 | n/a |
| 2001 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 30 | 26 | 442.3 | 11.4 | $2,400 | 341.8076923076923 | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 370.2916666666667 | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 31 | 27 | 425.9 | 11.0 | $2,300 | 329.14814814814815 | n/a |
| 1999 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 21 | 29 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 370.2916666666667 | n/a |
| 1999 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 36 | 28 | 410.7 | 10.6 | $2,250 | 317.39285714285717 | n/a |
| 1998 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 21 | 30 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 370.2916666666667 | n/a |
| 1998 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 25 | 37 | 29 | 396.6 | 10.3 | $2,150 | 306.44827586206895 | n/a |
| 1997 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular | (FFS) | 22 | 31 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 355.48 | n/a |
| 1997 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | (FFS) | 25 | 35 | 29 | 396.6 | 10.3 | $2,150 | 306.44827586206895 | n/a |
| 1996 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular | (FFS) | 22 | 30 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 355.48 | n/a |
| 1996 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | (FFS) | 24 | 35 | 28 | 410.7 | 10.6 | $2,250 | 317.39285714285717 | n/a |
| 1995 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular | (FFS) | 23 | 30 | 26 | 442.3 | 11.4 | $2,400 | 341.8076923076923 | n/a |
| 1995 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | (FFS) | 25 | 34 | 28 | 410.7 | 10.6 | $2,250 | 317.39285714285717 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 5 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 → 1997 | 28 → 29 mpg | +1 mpg | 397 gal |
| 1998 → 1999 | 29 → 28 mpg | -1 mpg | 411 gal |
| 1999 → 2000 | 28 → 27 mpg | -1 mpg | 426 gal |
| 2000 → 2001 | 27 → 26 mpg | -1 mpg | 442 gal |
| 2001 → 2002 | 26 → 27 mpg | +1 mpg | 426 gal |
What Neon fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2002 Dodge Neon burns 426 to 479 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,278 | $1,438 | $160 |
| $3.50/gal | $1,491 | $1,677 | $186 |
| $4.00/gal | $1,704 | $1,917 | $213 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2002 model year is $2,300 to $2,600 a year in fuel, or $1,750 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Compact Cars
Across the 498 nameplates EPA classifies as Compact Cars, the median best combined rating is 26 mpg. At 27 mpg the Dodge Neon is 1 mpg better the median, which is worth about $57 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Compact Cars rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Dodge nameplates
Every Dodge model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.