Volvo 240 DL/GL/Turbo MPG by year — every rating on record
The Volvo 240 DL/GL/Turbo has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 2 model years, from 1984 to 1985. Across those years its best rated version returned 26 mpg (1984) and its thirstiest returned 17 mpg (1984). The EPA record holds 19 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Compact Cars.
In the EPA record this nameplate also appears as 240 DL/GL/Turbo and 240 DL/GL/turbo. The figures below cover every one of them.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 14 | 26 mpg | 17 mpg | #17 of 36 (54th pct) | n/a | Regular, Diesel | Compact Cars |
| 1985 | 5 | 22 mpg | 17 mpg | #28 of 45 (39th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Regular | Compact Cars |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Volvo 240 DL/GL/Turbo placed highest in 1984 at #17 of 36, and lowest in 1985 at #28 of 45. It spent 1 of its 2 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 19 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 2.1L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 4-spd Regular | (FFS,TRBO) CA model, turbocharged | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 1985 | 2.1L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | (FFS,TRBO), turbocharged | 15 | 19 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 1985 | 2.1L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 4-spd Regular | (FFS,TRBO), turbocharged | 15 | 20 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 1985 | 2.3L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | (FFS) | 18 | 22 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,100 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 1985 | 2.3L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 4-spd Regular | (FFS) | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.1L 4-cyl Automatic 4-spd Regular | (FFS,TRBO), turbocharged | 16 | 20 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.1L 4-cyl Automatic 4-spd Regular | (FFS,TRBO) CA model, turbocharged | 16 | 20 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.1L 4-cyl Manual 5-spd Regular | (FFS,TRBO), turbocharged | 16 | 21 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.1L 4-cyl Manual 5-spd Regular | (FFS,TRBO) CA model, turbocharged | 16 | 21 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Automatic 4-spd Regular | 2.3L 4-cyl | 18 | 22 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Automatic 4-spd Regular | CA model | 18 | 22 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Automatic 4-spd Regular | (FFS) | 18 | 23 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,100 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Automatic 4-spd Regular | (FFS) CA model | 18 | 23 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,100 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.3L 4-cyl | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Manual 5-spd Regular | CA model | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Manual 5-spd Regular | (FFS) | 20 | 27 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 386.39130434782606 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.3L 4-cyl Manual 5-spd Regular | (FFS) CA model | 20 | 27 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 386.39130434782606 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.4L 6-cyl Automatic 3-spd Diesel | (DIESEL), Diesel | 22 | 26 | 24 | 479.2 | 14.9 | $3,750 | 424.1666666666667 | n/a |
| 1984 | 2.4L 6-cyl Manual 5-spd Diesel | (DIESEL), Diesel | 23 | 31 | 26 | 442.3 | 13.7 | $3,450 | 391.53846153846155 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 0 of 1 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 → 1985 | 26 → 22 mpg | -4 mpg | 523 gal |
What 240 DL/GL/Turbo fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 1985 Volvo 240 DL/GL/Turbo burns 523 to 676 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,568 | $2,029 | $461 |
| $3.50/gal | $1,830 | $2,368 | $538 |
| $4.00/gal | $2,091 | $2,706 | $615 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 1985 model year is $2,850 to $3,650 a year in fuel, or $7,000 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Compact Cars
Across the 498 nameplates EPA classifies as Compact Cars, the median best combined rating is 26 mpg. At 22 mpg the Volvo 240 DL/GL/Turbo is 4 mpg below the median, which is worth about $281 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Compact Cars rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Volvo nameplates
Every Volvo model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.