Tank Ledger

Oldsmobile Aurora MPG by year — every rating on record

The Oldsmobile Aurora has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 8 model years, from 1995 to 2003. Across those years its best rated version returned 20 mpg (2001) and its thirstiest returned 17 mpg (1995). The EPA record holds 10 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Midsize Cars.

20best combined mpg (2001)
17worst combined mpg (1995)
18latest year best (2003)
10configurations on record

Year-by-year EPA ratings

Model yearConfigurationsBest combinedWorst combinedClass rank that yearDrivetrainsFuelEPA class
1995117 mpg17 mpg#33 of 39 (16th pct)Front-Wheel DrivePremiumMidsize Cars
1996118 mpg18 mpg#30 of 36 (17th pct)Front-Wheel DrivePremiumMidsize Cars
1997118 mpg18 mpg#39 of 43 (10th pct)Front-Wheel DrivePremiumMidsize Cars
1998118 mpg18 mpg#43 of 47 (9th pct)Front-Wheel DrivePremiumMidsize Cars
1999118 mpg18 mpg#48 of 56 (15th pct)Front-Wheel DrivePremiumMidsize Cars
2001220 mpg18 mpg#28 of 54 (49th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegular, PremiumMidsize Cars
2002219 mpg19 mpg#37 of 52 (29th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize Cars
2003118 mpg18 mpg#39 of 46 (16th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize Cars

Where it has stood in its class

Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Oldsmobile Aurora placed highest in 2001 at #28 of 54, and lowest in 1999 at #48 of 56. It spent 0 of its 8 ranked years in the top half of its class.

Every configuration on record

All 10 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.

YearConfigurationEngine detailCityHighwayCombinedGallons/yrBarrels/yrEPA fuel cost/yrCO2 g/miGHG
20034.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular4.0L 8-cyl152418638.916.5$3,450493.72222222222223n/a
20023.5L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular3.5L 6-cyl162519605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20024.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular4.0L 8-cyl162419605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20014.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Premium4.0L 8-cyl152318638.916.5$4,300493.72222222222223n/a
20013.5L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular3.5L 6-cyl172520575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19994.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Premium4.0L 8-cyl152318638.916.5$4,300493.72222222222223n/a
19984.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Premium4.0L 8-cyl152318638.916.5$4,300493.72222222222223n/a
19974.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Premium(FFS) (MPFI)152418638.916.5$4,300493.72222222222223n/a
19964.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Premium(FFS) (MPFI)152418638.916.5$4,300493.72222222222223n/a
19954.0L 8-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Premium(FFS) (MPFI)152217676.517.5$4,550522.7647058823529n/a

How the rating has moved between model years

Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 4 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.

ChangeBest combinedDeltaGallons a year at the newer rating
1995 → 199617 → 18 mpg+1 mpg639 gal
1999 → 200118 → 20 mpg+2 mpg575 gal
2001 → 200220 → 19 mpg-1 mpg605 gal
2002 → 200319 → 18 mpg-1 mpg639 gal

What Aurora fuel costs over a year

At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2003 Oldsmobile Aurora burns 639 to 639 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.

Pump priceMost efficientThirstiestSpread
$3.00/gal$1,917$1,917$0
$3.50/gal$2,236$2,236$0
$4.00/gal$2,556$2,556$0

EPA’s own estimate for the 2003 model year is $3,450 to $3,450 a year in fuel, or $6,000 more than the average new vehicle over five years.

How it compares with other Midsize Cars

Across the 483 nameplates EPA classifies as Midsize Cars, the median best combined rating is 25 mpg. At 18 mpg the Oldsmobile Aurora is 7 mpg below the median, which is worth about $626 a year at $3.50 a gallon.

Other Oldsmobile nameplates

Every Oldsmobile model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.