Mazda RX-8 MPG by year — every rating on record
The Mazda RX-8 has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 8 model years, from 2004 to 2011. Across those years its best rated version returned 19 mpg (2006) and its thirstiest returned 18 mpg (2004). The EPA record holds 16 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Subcompact Cars.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2 | 18 mpg | 18 mpg | #23 of 31 (27th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
| 2005 | 2 | 18 mpg | 18 mpg | #21 of 29 (29th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
| 2006 | 2 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #25 of 38 (35th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
| 2007 | 2 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #28 of 40 (31th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
| 2008 | 2 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #42 of 59 (29th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
| 2009 | 2 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #46 of 61 (25th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
| 2010 | 2 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #49 of 63 (23th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
| 2011 | 2 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #48 of 60 (20th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Subcompact Cars |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Mazda RX-8 placed highest in 2005 at #21 of 29, and lowest in 2010 at #49 of 63. It spent 0 of its 8 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 16 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2011 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2010 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | PR | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2010 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Premium | PR | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2009 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2009 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2008 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2008 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2007 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2007 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2006 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2006 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2005 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2005 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S4) Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2004 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 6-spd Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2004 | 1.3L 2-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S4) Premium | 1.3L 2-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 1 of 1 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 → 2006 | 18 → 19 mpg | +1 mpg | 605 gal |
What RX-8 fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2011 Mazda RX-8 burns 605 to 639 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,816 | $1,917 | $101 |
| $3.50/gal | $2,118 | $2,236 | $118 |
| $4.00/gal | $2,421 | $2,556 | $135 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2011 model year is $4,100 to $4,300 a year in fuel, or $10,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Subcompact Cars
Across the 461 nameplates EPA classifies as Subcompact Cars, the median best combined rating is 24 mpg. At 19 mpg the Mazda RX-8 is 5 mpg below the median, which is worth about $441 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Subcompact Cars rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Mazda nameplates
Every Mazda model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.