Lincoln MKT MPG by year — every rating on record
The Lincoln MKT has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 10 model years, from 2010 to 2019. Across those years its best rated version returned 20 mpg (2012) and its thirstiest returned 17 mpg (2016). The EPA record holds 22 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD / Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 3 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #50 of 80 (38th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2011 | 3 | 19 mpg | 18 mpg | #52 of 78 (34th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2012 | 2 | 20 mpg | 18 mpg | #38 of 69 (46th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2013 | 2 | 20 mpg | 18 mpg | #38 of 43 (12th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2014 | 2 | 20 mpg | 18 mpg | #59 of 62 (5th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| 2015 | 2 | 20 mpg | 18 mpg | #9 of 28 (70th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2016 | 2 | 19 mpg | 17 mpg | #15 of 26 (44th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2017 | 2 | 19 mpg | 17 mpg | #15 of 27 (46th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2018 | 2 | 19 mpg | 17 mpg | #18 of 25 (29th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2019 | 2 | 19 mpg | 17 mpg | #12 of 23 (50th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Lincoln MKT placed highest in 2015 at #9 of 28, and lowest in 2014 at #59 of 62. It spent 2 of its 10 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 22 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 523 | 3/10 |
| 2019 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 468 | 3/10 |
| 2018 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 523 | 3/10 |
| 2018 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 468 | 3/10 |
| 2017 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 523 | 3/10 |
| 2017 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 468 | 4/10 |
| 2016 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 523 | 3/10 |
| 2016 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 472 | 4/10 |
| 2015 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 481 | 4/10 |
| 2015 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,100 | 446 | 5/10 |
| 2014 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 16 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 483 | 4/10 |
| 2014 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,100 | 446 | 5/10 |
| 2013 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 481 | 4/10 |
| 2013 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,100 | 446 | 5/10 |
| 2012 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2012 | 3.5L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.5L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,100 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2011 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 16 | 21 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2011 | 3.7L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2011 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2010 | 3.5L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.5L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2010 | 3.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.5L 6-cyl, turbocharged | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2010 | 3.5L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.5L 6-cyl | 17 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 1 of 2 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 → 2012 | 19 → 20 mpg | +1 mpg | 575 gal |
| 2015 → 2016 | 20 → 19 mpg | -1 mpg | 605 gal |
What MKT fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2019 Lincoln MKT burns 605 to 676 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,816 | $2,029 | $214 |
| $3.50/gal | $2,118 | $2,368 | $249 |
| $4.00/gal | $2,421 | $2,706 | $285 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2019 model year is $3,300 to $3,650 a year in fuel, or $5,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Across the 70 nameplates EPA classifies as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, the median best combined rating is 23 mpg. At 19 mpg the Lincoln MKT is 4 mpg below the median, which is worth about $368 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Lincoln nameplates
Every Lincoln model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.