Lincoln LS MPG by year — every rating on record
The Lincoln LS has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 7 model years, from 2000 to 2006. Across those years its best rated version returned 21 mpg (2003) and its thirstiest returned 17 mpg (2000). The EPA record holds 29 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Midsize Cars.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 5 | 18 mpg | 17 mpg | #43 of 51 (16th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Midsize Cars |
| 2001 | 5 | 19 mpg | 17 mpg | #32 of 54 (42th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Midsize Cars |
| 2002 | 5 | 19 mpg | 17 mpg | #36 of 52 (31th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Midsize Cars |
| 2003 | 4 | 21 mpg | 18 mpg | #18 of 46 (62th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Midsize Cars |
| 2004 | 4 | 21 mpg | 18 mpg | #25 of 55 (56th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Midsize Cars |
| 2005 | 4 | 20 mpg | 18 mpg | #33 of 56 (42th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Midsize Cars |
| 2006 | 2 | 18 mpg | 18 mpg | #50 of 61 (18th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive | Premium | Midsize Cars |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Lincoln LS placed highest in 2003 at #18 of 46, and lowest in 2006 at #50 of 61. It spent 2 of its 7 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 29 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2006 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 16 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2005 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2005 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2005 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,900 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2005 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,900 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2004 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 15 | 21 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2004 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 15 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2004 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,900 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2004 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 18 | 25 | 21 | 547.6 | 14.2 | $3,700 | 423.1904761904762 | n/a |
| 2003 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2003 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | SST | 16 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2003 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,900 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2003 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | SST | 18 | 25 | 21 | 547.6 | 14.2 | $3,700 | 423.1904761904762 | n/a |
| 2002 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.9L4V-N | 15 | 22 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $4,550 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2002 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 15 | 22 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $4,550 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2002 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.0M | 15 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2002 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2002 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2001 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 15 | 22 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $4,550 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2001 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.9L 8-cyl | 15 | 22 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $4,550 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2001 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (S5) Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 15 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2001 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2001 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 16 | 23 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $4,100 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2000 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | SELECT SFT | 15 | 22 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $4,550 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2000 | 3.9L 8-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.9L4V-N | 15 | 22 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $4,550 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2000 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | 3.0L 6-cyl | 16 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2000 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Premium | SELECT SFT | 15 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2000 | 3.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Premium | 3 | 15 | 23 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $4,300 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 4 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 → 2001 | 18 → 19 mpg | +1 mpg | 605 gal |
| 2002 → 2003 | 19 → 21 mpg | +2 mpg | 548 gal |
| 2004 → 2005 | 21 → 20 mpg | -1 mpg | 575 gal |
| 2005 → 2006 | 20 → 18 mpg | -2 mpg | 639 gal |
What LS fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2006 Lincoln LS burns 639 to 639 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,917 | $1,917 | $0 |
| $3.50/gal | $2,236 | $2,236 | $0 |
| $4.00/gal | $2,556 | $2,556 | $0 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2006 model year is $4,300 to $4,300 a year in fuel, or $10,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Midsize Cars
Across the 483 nameplates EPA classifies as Midsize Cars, the median best combined rating is 25 mpg. At 18 mpg the Lincoln LS is 7 mpg below the median, which is worth about $626 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Midsize Cars rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Lincoln nameplates
Every Lincoln model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.