Tank Ledger

Suzuki Equator MPG by year — every rating on record

The Suzuki Equator has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 4 model years, from 2009 to 2012. Across those years its best rated version returned 21 mpg (2009) and its thirstiest returned 16 mpg (2009). The EPA record holds 16 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Small Pickup Trucks 2WD / Small Pickup Trucks 4WD.

21best combined mpg (2009)
16worst combined mpg (2009)
21latest year best (2012)
16configurations on record

Year-by-year EPA ratings

Model yearConfigurationsBest combinedWorst combinedClass rank that yearDrivetrainsFuelEPA class
2009421 mpg16 mpg#5 of 9 (50th pct)Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel or All-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Pickup Trucks 2WD, Small Pickup Trucks 4WD
2010421 mpg16 mpg#6 of 8 (29th pct)Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Pickup Trucks 2WD, Small Pickup Trucks 4WD
2011421 mpg16 mpg#6 of 8 (29th pct)Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Pickup Trucks 2WD, Small Pickup Trucks 4WD
2012421 mpg16 mpg#5 of 7 (33th pct)Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Pickup Trucks 2WD, Small Pickup Trucks 4WD

Where it has stood in its class

Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Suzuki Equator placed highest in 2009 at #5 of 9, and lowest in 2010 at #6 of 8. It spent 1 of its 4 ranked years in the top half of its class.

Every configuration on record

All 16 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.

YearConfigurationEngine detailCityHighwayCombinedGallons/yrBarrels/yrEPA fuel cost/yrCO2 g/miGHG
20124.0L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl151916718.818.6$3,900555.4375n/a
20124.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl152017676.517.5$3,650522.7647058823529n/a
20122.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl172219605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20122.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl192321547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
20114.0L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl151916718.818.6$3,900555.4375n/a
20114.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl152017676.517.5$3,650522.7647058823529n/a
20112.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl172219605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20112.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl192321547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
20104.0L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl151916718.818.6$3,900555.4375n/a
20104.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl152017676.517.5$3,650522.7647058823529n/a
20102.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl172219605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20102.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl192321547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
20094.0L 6-cyl 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl151916718.818.6$3,900555.4375n/a
20094.0L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular4.0L 6-cyl152017676.517.5$3,650522.7647058823529n/a
20092.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl172219605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20092.5L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular2.5L 4-cyl192321547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a

What Equator fuel costs over a year

At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2012 Suzuki Equator burns 548 to 719 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.

Pump priceMost efficientThirstiestSpread
$3.00/gal$1,643$2,156$513
$3.50/gal$1,917$2,516$599
$4.00/gal$2,190$2,875$685

EPA’s own estimate for the 2012 model year is $2,950 to $3,900 a year in fuel, or $5,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.

How it compares with other Small Pickup Trucks 2WD

Across the 27 nameplates EPA classifies as Small Pickup Trucks 2WD, the median best combined rating is 23 mpg. At 21 mpg the Suzuki Equator is 2 mpg below the median, which is worth about $167 a year at $3.50 a gallon.

Other Suzuki nameplates

Every Suzuki model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.