Tank Ledger

Oldsmobile Cutlass Cruiser MPG by year — every rating on record

The Oldsmobile Cutlass Cruiser has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 10 model years, from 1986 to 1995. Across those years its best rated version returned 24 mpg (1989) and its thirstiest returned 18 mpg (1986). The EPA record holds 29 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Midsize-Large Station Wagons.

24best combined mpg (1989)
18worst combined mpg (1986)
20latest year best (1995)
29configurations on record

Year-by-year EPA ratings

Model yearConfigurationsBest combinedWorst combinedClass rank that yearDrivetrainsFuelEPA class
1986521 mpg18 mpg#11 of 23 (55th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1987421 mpg19 mpg#12 of 24 (52th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1988322 mpg20 mpg#7 of 25 (75th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1989324 mpg20 mpg#2 of 21 (95th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1990221 mpg21 mpg#5 of 22 (81th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1991321 mpg19 mpg#6 of 18 (71th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1992321 mpg19 mpg#10 of 22 (57th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1993321 mpg19 mpg#9 of 19 (56th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1994120 mpg20 mpg#10 of 17 (44th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons
1995220 mpg20 mpg#11 of 16 (33th pct)Front-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize-Large Station Wagons

Where it has stood in its class

Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Oldsmobile Cutlass Cruiser placed highest in 1989 at #2 of 21, and lowest in 1987 at #12 of 24. It spent 8 of its 10 ranked years in the top half of its class.

Every configuration on record

All 29 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.

YearConfigurationEngine detailCityHighwayCombinedGallons/yrBarrels/yrEPA fuel cost/yrCO2 g/miGHG
19953.1L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS) (MPFI)172620575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19953.1L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS) (MPFI)172620575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19943.1L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS) (MPFI)172620575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19933.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)172419605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19932.2L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)182621547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19933.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)182621547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19923.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)172419605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19923.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)172720575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19922.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)182621547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19913.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)172319605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19913.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)172720575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19912.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)182621547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19902.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)182521547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19903.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)182621547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19893.3L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)172620575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19892.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)182721547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19892.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)212824479.212.4$2,600370.2916666666667n/a
19883.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)172620575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19882.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)182721547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19882.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)192622522.713.5$2,850403.95454545454544n/a
19872.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)172219605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19873.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)162519605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19872.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)172420575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
19872.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)182621547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a
19862.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)162218638.916.5$3,450493.72222222222223n/a
19862.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)172319605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19862.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)172319605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19862.8L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular(FFS)162419605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
19862.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 3-spd Regular(FFS)192621547.614.2$2,950423.1904761904762n/a

How the rating has moved between model years

Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 4 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.

ChangeBest combinedDeltaGallons a year at the newer rating
1987 → 198821 → 22 mpg+1 mpg523 gal
1988 → 198922 → 24 mpg+2 mpg479 gal
1989 → 199024 → 21 mpg-3 mpg548 gal
1993 → 199421 → 20 mpg-1 mpg575 gal

What Cutlass Cruiser fuel costs over a year

At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cruiser burns 575 to 575 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.

Pump priceMost efficientThirstiestSpread
$3.00/gal$1,725$1,725$0
$3.50/gal$2,013$2,013$0
$4.00/gal$2,300$2,300$0

EPA’s own estimate for the 1995 model year is $3,100 to $3,100 a year in fuel, or $4,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.

How it compares with other Midsize-Large Station Wagons

Across the 53 nameplates EPA classifies as Midsize-Large Station Wagons, the median best combined rating is 21 mpg. At 20 mpg the Oldsmobile Cutlass Cruiser is 1 mpg below the median, which is worth about $96 a year at $3.50 a gallon.

Other Oldsmobile nameplates

Every Oldsmobile model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.