Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback MPG by year — every rating on record
The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 9 model years, from 2004 to 2014. Across those years its best rated version returned 27 mpg (2011) and its thirstiest returned 20 mpg (2009). The EPA record holds 20 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Small Station Wagons.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 1 | 22 mpg | 22 mpg | #8 of 14 (46th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Station Wagons |
| 2005 | 1 | 22 mpg | 22 mpg | #9 of 17 (50th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Station Wagons |
| 2006 | 1 | 22 mpg | 22 mpg | #10 of 16 (40th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Station Wagons |
| 2009 | 3 | 23 mpg | 20 mpg | #14 of 20 (32th pct) | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Premium, Regular | Small Station Wagons |
| 2010 | 3 | 23 mpg | 20 mpg | #16 of 22 (29th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Premium, Regular | Small Station Wagons |
| 2011 | 5 | 27 mpg | 20 mpg | #9 of 23 (64th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular, Premium | Small Station Wagons |
| 2012 | 2 | 27 mpg | 25 mpg | #11 of 23 (55th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Station Wagons |
| 2013 | 2 | 27 mpg | 25 mpg | #11 of 17 (38th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Station Wagons |
| 2014 | 2 | 27 mpg | 25 mpg | #8 of 16 (53th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Station Wagons |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback placed highest in 2004 at #8 of 14, and lowest in 2010 at #16 of 22. It spent 4 of its 9 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 20 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.4L 4-cyl | 22 | 28 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 361 | 6/10 |
| 2014 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 32 | 27 | 425.9 | 11.0 | $2,300 | 326 | 7/10 |
| 2013 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.4L 4-cyl | 22 | 28 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 361 | 6/10 |
| 2013 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 32 | 27 | 425.9 | 11.0 | $2,300 | 326 | 7/10 |
| 2012 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.4L 4-cyl | 22 | 28 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 355.48 | n/a |
| 2012 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 32 | 27 | 425.9 | 11.0 | $2,300 | 329.14814814814815 | n/a |
| 2011 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (AM6) Premium | 2.0L 4-cyl, turbocharged | 18 | 25 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,900 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.4L 4-cyl | 22 | 30 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 355.48 | n/a |
| 2011 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.4L 4-cyl | 23 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 355.48 | n/a |
| 2011 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 32 | 27 | 425.9 | 11.0 | $2,300 | 329.14814814814815 | n/a |
| 2011 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 24 | 31 | 27 | 425.9 | 11.0 | $2,300 | 329.14814814814815 | n/a |
| 2010 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (AM6) Premium | PR, turbocharged | 17 | 25 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,900 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | 2.4L 4-cyl | 20 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
| 2010 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (AV-S6) Regular | 2.4L 4-cyl | 21 | 27 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 386.39130434782606 | n/a |
| 2009 | 2.0L 4-cyl 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Premium | DOHC TURBO, turbocharged | 17 | 25 | 20 | 575.0 | 14.9 | $3,900 | 444.35 | n/a |
| 2009 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Manual 5-spd Regular | DOHC | 20 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
| 2009 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (variable gear ratios) Regular | DOHC | 21 | 27 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 386.39130434782606 | n/a |
| 2006 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | SOHC | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
| 2005 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | SOHC | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
| 2004 | 2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | SOHC | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 403.95454545454544 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 2 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 → 2009 | 22 → 23 mpg | +1 mpg | 500 gal |
| 2010 → 2011 | 23 → 27 mpg | +4 mpg | 426 gal |
What Lancer Sportback fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2014 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback burns 426 to 460 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,278 | $1,380 | $102 |
| $3.50/gal | $1,491 | $1,610 | $119 |
| $4.00/gal | $1,704 | $1,840 | $136 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2014 model year is $2,300 to $2,500 a year in fuel, or $250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Small Station Wagons
Across the 142 nameplates EPA classifies as Small Station Wagons, the median best combined rating is 27 mpg. At 27 mpg the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback is exactly at the median.
- All Small Station Wagons rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Mitsubishi nameplates
Every Mitsubishi model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.