Mazda CX-9 MPG by year — every rating on record
The Mazda CX-9 has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 17 model years, from 2007 to 2023. Across those years its best rated version returned 24 mpg (2016) and its thirstiest returned 17 mpg (2007). The EPA record holds 32 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2 | 18 mpg | 17 mpg | #42 of 71 (41th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2008 | 2 | 18 mpg | 17 mpg | #47 of 76 (39th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2009 | 2 | 18 mpg | 17 mpg | #53 of 82 (36th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2010 | 2 | 18 mpg | 17 mpg | #57 of 80 (29th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2011 | 2 | 19 mpg | 19 mpg | #53 of 78 (32th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2012 | 2 | 19 mpg | 19 mpg | #50 of 69 (28th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD, Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD |
| 2013 | 2 | 19 mpg | 19 mpg | #41 of 43 (5th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2014 | 2 | 19 mpg | 19 mpg | #43 of 45 (5th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2015 | 2 | 19 mpg | 19 mpg | #52 of 53 (2th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2016 | 2 | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | #32 of 51 (38th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2017 | 2 | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | #34 of 52 (35th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2018 | 2 | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | #32 of 52 (39th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2019 | 2 | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | #40 of 58 (32th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2020 | 2 | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | #47 of 63 (26th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2021 | 2 | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | #52 of 63 (18th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2022 | 1 | 23 mpg | 23 mpg | #113 of 151 (25th pct) | 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2023 | 1 | 23 mpg | 23 mpg | #127 of 166 (24th pct) | 4-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Mazda CX-9 placed highest in 2016 at #32 of 51, and lowest in 2023 at #127 of 166. It spent 0 of its 17 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 32 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 392 | 5/10 |
| 2022 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 392 | 5/10 |
| 2021 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 391 | 5/10 |
| 2021 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 363 | 5/10 |
| 2020 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 391 | 5/10 |
| 2020 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 363 | 5/10 |
| 2019 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 391 | 5/10 |
| 2019 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 362 | 5/10 |
| 2018 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 391 | 5/10 |
| 2018 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 362 | 5/10 |
| 2017 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 390 | 5/10 |
| 2017 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 362 | 5/10 |
| 2016 | 2.5L 4-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 21 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 384 | 5/10 |
| 2016 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 364 | 6/10 |
| 2015 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 456 | 4/10 |
| 2015 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 480 | 4/10 |
| 2014 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 456 | 4/10 |
| 2014 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 480 | 4/10 |
| 2013 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 456 | 4/10 |
| 2013 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 480 | 4/10 |
| 2012 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2012 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2011 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 17 | 24 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2011 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 19 | 605.3 | 15.7 | $3,300 | 467.7368421052632 | n/a |
| 2010 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2010 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2009 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2009 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2008 | 3.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2008 | 3.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.7L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
| 2007 | 3.5L 6-cyl 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.5L 6-cyl | 15 | 21 | 17 | 676.5 | 17.5 | $3,650 | 522.7647058823529 | n/a |
| 2007 | 3.5L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 3.5L 6-cyl | 16 | 22 | 18 | 638.9 | 16.5 | $3,450 | 493.72222222222223 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 3 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 → 2011 | 18 → 19 mpg | +1 mpg | 605 gal |
| 2015 → 2016 | 19 → 24 mpg | +5 mpg | 479 gal |
| 2021 → 2022 | 24 → 23 mpg | -1 mpg | 500 gal |
What CX-9 fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2023 Mazda CX-9 burns 500 to 500 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,500 | $1,500 | $0 |
| $3.50/gal | $1,750 | $1,750 | $0 |
| $4.00/gal | $2,000 | $2,000 | $0 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2023 model year is $2,700 to $2,700 a year in fuel, or $2,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Across the 311 nameplates EPA classifies as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, the median best combined rating is 27 mpg. At 23 mpg the Mazda CX-9 is 4 mpg below the median, which is worth about $259 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Mazda nameplates
Every Mazda model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.