Tank Ledger

Lincoln MKS MPG by year — every rating on record

The Lincoln MKS has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 8 model years, from 2009 to 2016. Across those years its best rated version returned 22 mpg (2014) and its thirstiest returned 19 mpg (2009). The EPA record holds 23 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Large Cars.

22best combined mpg (2014)
19worst combined mpg (2009)
20latest year best (2016)
23configurations on record

Year-by-year EPA ratings

Model yearConfigurationsBest combinedWorst combinedClass rank that yearDrivetrainsFuelEPA class
2009219 mpg19 mpg#20 of 45 (57th pct)4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars
2010320 mpg19 mpg#13 of 47 (74th pct)All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars
2011320 mpg19 mpg#19 of 54 (66th pct)All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars
2012320 mpg19 mpg#21 of 56 (64th pct)All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars
2013321 mpg20 mpg#25 of 59 (59th pct)All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars
2014322 mpg20 mpg#25 of 64 (62th pct)All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars
2015322 mpg20 mpg#36 of 75 (53th pct)All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars
2016320 mpg19 mpg#49 of 72 (32th pct)All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveRegularLarge Cars

Where it has stood in its class

Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Lincoln MKS placed highest in 2010 at #13 of 47, and lowest in 2016 at #49 of 72. It spent 7 of its 8 ranked years in the top half of its class.

Every configuration on record

All 23 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.

YearConfigurationEngine detailCityHighwayCombinedGallons/yrBarrels/yrEPA fuel cost/yrCO2 g/miGHG
20163.7L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl172419605.315.7$3,3004624/10
20163.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) RegularSIDI, turbocharged162419605.315.7$3,3004734/10
20163.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl172520575.014.9$3,1004384/10
20153.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) RegularSIDI, turbocharged172520575.014.9$3,1004505/10
20153.7L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl182621547.614.2$2,9504255/10
20153.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl192822522.713.5$2,8504025/10
20143.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) RegularSIDI, turbocharged172520575.014.9$3,1004465/10
20143.7L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl182621547.614.2$2,9504255/10
20143.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl192822522.713.5$2,8504025/10
20133.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) RegularSIDI, turbocharged172520575.014.9$3,1004465/10
20133.7L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl182621547.614.2$2,9504245/10
20133.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl182721547.614.2$2,9504225/10
20123.7L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl162319605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20123.5L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.5L 6-cyl172420575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
20123.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) RegularSIDI, turbocharged172420575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
20113.7L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl162219605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20113.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular3.7L 6-cyl172419605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20113.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) RegularSIDI, turbocharged172520575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
20103.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular3.5L 6-cyl162319605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20103.5L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular3.5L 6-cyl172419605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20103.5L 6-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular3.5L 6-cyl, turbocharged172520575.014.9$3,100444.35n/a
20093.7L 6-cyl 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular3.7L 6-cyl162319605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a
20093.7L 6-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular3.7L 6-cyl172419605.315.7$3,300467.7368421052632n/a

How the rating has moved between model years

Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 3 of 4 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.

ChangeBest combinedDeltaGallons a year at the newer rating
2009 → 201019 → 20 mpg+1 mpg575 gal
2012 → 201320 → 21 mpg+1 mpg548 gal
2013 → 201421 → 22 mpg+1 mpg523 gal
2015 → 201622 → 20 mpg-2 mpg575 gal

What MKS fuel costs over a year

At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2016 Lincoln MKS burns 575 to 605 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.

Pump priceMost efficientThirstiestSpread
$3.00/gal$1,725$1,816$91
$3.50/gal$2,013$2,118$106
$4.00/gal$2,300$2,421$121

EPA’s own estimate for the 2016 model year is $3,100 to $3,300 a year in fuel, or $5,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.

How it compares with other Large Cars

Across the 305 nameplates EPA classifies as Large Cars, the median best combined rating is 21 mpg. At 20 mpg the Lincoln MKS is 1 mpg below the median, which is worth about $96 a year at $3.50 a gallon.

Other Lincoln nameplates

Every Lincoln model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.