Ford Transit Connect Wagon MPG by year — every rating on record
The Ford Transit Connect Wagon has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 7 model years, from 2012 to 2018. Across those years its best rated version returned 25 mpg (2015) and its thirstiest returned 22 mpg (2016). The EPA record holds 13 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 1 | 23 mpg | 23 mpg | #3 of 5 (50th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD |
| 2013 | 1 | 23 mpg | 23 mpg | #2 of 6 (80th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD |
| 2014 | 2 | 24 mpg | 23 mpg | #2 of 9 (88th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD |
| 2015 | 2 | 25 mpg | 23 mpg | #3 of 14 (85th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD |
| 2016 | 3 | 24 mpg | 22 mpg | #4 of 16 (80th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular, Gasoline or E85 | Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD |
| 2017 | 2 | 22 mpg | 22 mpg | #6 of 14 (62th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular, Gasoline or E85 | Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD |
| 2018 | 2 | 22 mpg | 22 mpg | #6 of 15 (64th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive | Gasoline or E85, Regular | Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Ford Transit Connect Wagon placed highest in 2013 at #2 of 6, and lowest in 2017 at #6 of 14. It spent 7 of its 7 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 13 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Gasoline or E85 | FFV, FFV | 19 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 404 | 4/10 |
| 2018 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 2.5L 4-cyl | 19 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 404 | 4/10 |
| 2017 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 2.5L 4-cyl | 19 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 407 | 5/10 |
| 2017 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Gasoline or E85 | FFV, FFV | 19 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 401 | 5/10 |
| 2016 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 2.5L 4-cyl | 19 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 407 | 5/10 |
| 2016 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Gasoline or E85 | FFV, FFV | 19 | 27 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $2,850 | 407 | 5/10 |
| 2016 | 1.6L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 29 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 364 | 6/10 |
| 2015 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 2.5L 4-cyl | 20 | 28 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 386 | 5/10 |
| 2015 | 1.6L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 357 | 6/10 |
| 2014 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | 2.5L 4-cyl | 20 | 28 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 384 | 6/10 |
| 2014 | 1.6L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S6) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged | 22 | 29 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 364 | 6/10 |
| 2013 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 22 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 378 | 6/10 |
| 2012 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 4-spd Regular | 2.0L 4-cyl | 22 | 26 | 23 | 500.0 | 12.9 | $2,700 | 386.39130434782606 | n/a |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 4 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 → 2014 | 23 → 24 mpg | +1 mpg | 479 gal |
| 2014 → 2015 | 24 → 25 mpg | +1 mpg | 460 gal |
| 2015 → 2016 | 25 → 24 mpg | -1 mpg | 479 gal |
| 2016 → 2017 | 24 → 22 mpg | -2 mpg | 523 gal |
What Transit Connect Wagon fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2018 Ford Transit Connect Wagon burns 523 to 523 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,568 | $1,568 | $0 |
| $3.50/gal | $1,830 | $1,830 | $0 |
| $4.00/gal | $2,091 | $2,091 | $0 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2018 model year is $2,850 to $2,850 a year in fuel, or $3,000 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD
Across the 93 nameplates EPA classifies as Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD, the median best combined rating is 22 mpg. At 22 mpg the Ford Transit Connect Wagon is exactly at the median.
- All Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Ford nameplates
Every Ford model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.