Ford Mustang Mach-E MPG by year — every rating on record
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 6 model years, from 2021 to 2026. Across those years its best rated version returned 107 mpg (2025) and its thirstiest returned 91 mpg (2024). The EPA record holds 12 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD / Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 100 mpg | 93 mpg | #4 of 22 (86th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | Electricity | Small Station Wagons |
| 2022 | 2 | 103 mpg | 93 mpg | #9 of 151 (95th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | Electricity | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| 2023 | 2 | 103 mpg | 93 mpg | #13 of 166 (93th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | Electricity | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| 2024 | 2 | 102 mpg | 91 mpg | #24 of 77 (70th pct) | Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Electricity | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2025 | 2 | 107 mpg | 100 mpg | #17 of 194 (92th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | Electricity | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| 2026 | 2 | 107 mpg | 100 mpg | #22 of 188 (89th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | Electricity | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Ford Mustang Mach-E placed highest in 2021 at #4 of 22, and lowest in 2024 at #24 of 77. It spent 6 of its 6 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 12 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | Range | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 104 | 96 | 100 | 115.0 | 0.1 | $750 | 240 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2026 | Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 111 | 103 | 107 | 107.5 | 0.1 | $700 | 260 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2025 | All-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 104 | 96 | 100 | 115.0 | 0.1 | $750 | 240 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2025 | Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 111 | 103 | 107 | 107.5 | 0.1 | $700 | 260 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2024 | All-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 95 | 88 | 91 | 126.4 | 0.1 | $850 | 230 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2024 | Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 106 | 98 | 102 | 112.7 | 0.1 | $750 | 250 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2023 | All-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 99 | 86 | 93 | 123.7 | 0.1 | $800 | 224 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2023 | Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 110 | 96 | 103 | 111.7 | 0.1 | $750 | 247 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2022 | All-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 99 | 86 | 93 | 123.7 | 0.1 | $800 | 224 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2022 | Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 110 | 96 | 103 | 111.7 | 0.1 | $750 | 247 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2021 | All-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 100 | 86 | 93 | 123.7 | 0.1 | $800 | 211 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
| 2021 | Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic (A1) Electricity | EV | 105 | 93 | 100 | 115.0 | 0.1 | $750 | 230 mi | n/a | 10/10 |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 2 of 3 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 → 2022 | 100 → 103 mpg | +3 mpg | 112 gal |
| 2023 → 2024 | 103 → 102 mpg | -1 mpg | 113 gal |
| 2024 → 2025 | 102 → 107 mpg | +5 mpg | 107 gal |
What Mustang Mach-E fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E burns 107 to 115 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $322 | $345 | $23 |
| $3.50/gal | $376 | $403 | $26 |
| $4.00/gal | $430 | $460 | $30 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2026 model year is $700 to $750 a year in fuel, or $7,500 less than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Across the 311 nameplates EPA classifies as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, the median best combined rating is 27 mpg. At 107 mpg the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 80 mpg better the median, which is worth about $1,115 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Ford nameplates
Every Ford model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.