Buick Envision MPG by year — every rating on record
The Buick Envision has a combined EPA fuel economy rating for 11 model years, from 2016 to 2026. Across those years its best rated version returned 26 mpg (2021) and its thirstiest returned 22 mpg (2016). The EPA record holds 22 configurations for this nameplate, most recently a Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD.
Year-by-year EPA ratings
| Model year | Configurations | Best combined | Worst combined | Class rank that year | Drivetrains | Fuel | EPA class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 22 mpg | 22 mpg | #43 of 72 (41th pct) | All-Wheel Drive | Premium | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2017 | 3 | 25 mpg | 22 mpg | #23 of 78 (71th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Regular, Premium | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| 2018 | 3 | 25 mpg | 22 mpg | #24 of 52 (55th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular, Premium | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2019 | 3 | 25 mpg | 22 mpg | #40 of 93 (58th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Premium, Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| 2020 | 3 | 25 mpg | 22 mpg | #35 of 63 (45th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular, Premium | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2021 | 2 | 26 mpg | 25 mpg | #51 of 124 (59th pct) | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| 2022 | 2 | 26 mpg | 25 mpg | #34 of 68 (51th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2023 | 2 | 26 mpg | 25 mpg | #41 of 69 (41th pct) | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2024 | 1 | 24 mpg | 24 mpg | #113 of 176 (36th pct) | All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2025 | 1 | 24 mpg | 24 mpg | #138 of 194 (29th pct) | All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| 2026 | 1 | 25 mpg | 25 mpg | #126 of 188 (33th pct) | All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
Where it has stood in its class
Ranked against every other nameplate the EPA filed under the same class that year. The Buick Envision placed highest in 2017 at #23 of 78, and lowest in 2025 at #138 of 194. It spent 5 of its 11 ranked years in the top half of its class.
Every configuration on record
All 22 configurations EPA lists for this nameplate, newest first.
| Year | Configuration | Engine detail | City | Highway | Combined | Gallons/yr | Barrels/yr | EPA fuel cost/yr | CO2 g/mi | GHG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 22 | 28 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 361 | 5/10 |
| 2025 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 371 | 5/10 |
| 2024 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 22 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 371 | 5/10 |
| 2023 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 355 | 5/10 |
| 2023 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 23 | 31 | 26 | 442.3 | 11.4 | $2,400 | 337 | 5/10 |
| 2022 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 350 | 5/10 |
| 2022 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 24 | 31 | 26 | 442.3 | 11.4 | $2,400 | 341 | 5/10 |
| 2021 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 352 | 5/10 |
| 2021 | 2.0L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic (S9) Regular | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 24 | 31 | 26 | 442.3 | 11.4 | $2,400 | 341 | 5/10 |
| 2020 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 9-spd Premium | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 20 | 25 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $3,500 | 402 | 4/10 |
| 2020 | 2.5L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI, start-stop | 21 | 27 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 377 | 5/10 |
| 2020 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI, start-stop | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 359 | 5/10 |
| 2019 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 9-spd Premium | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 20 | 25 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $3,500 | 401 | 4/10 |
| 2019 | 2.5L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI | 21 | 27 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 377 | 5/10 |
| 2019 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI, start-stop | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 359 | 5/10 |
| 2018 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Premium | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $3,500 | 400 | 4/10 |
| 2018 | 2.5L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI | 21 | 27 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 377 | 5/10 |
| 2018 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI, start-stop | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 359 | 5/10 |
| 2017 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Premium | SIDI, turbocharged, start-stop | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $3,500 | 399 | 5/10 |
| 2017 | 2.5L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI, start-stop | 21 | 28 | 24 | 479.2 | 12.4 | $2,600 | 373 | 5/10 |
| 2017 | 2.5L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Regular | SIDI, start-stop | 22 | 29 | 25 | 460.0 | 11.9 | $2,500 | 356 | 5/10 |
| 2016 | 2.0L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive Automatic 6-spd Premium | SIDI, turbocharged | 20 | 26 | 22 | 522.7 | 13.5 | $3,500 | 394 | 5/10 |
How the rating has moved between model years
Comparing the best-rated configuration of each year. 3 of 4 year-over-year steps improved the top rating.
| Change | Best combined | Delta | Gallons a year at the newer rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 → 2017 | 22 → 25 mpg | +3 mpg | 460 gal |
| 2020 → 2021 | 25 → 26 mpg | +1 mpg | 442 gal |
| 2023 → 2024 | 26 → 24 mpg | -2 mpg | 479 gal |
| 2025 → 2026 | 24 → 25 mpg | +1 mpg | 460 gal |
What Envision fuel costs over a year
At the EPA's 11,500 miles a year, the 2026 Buick Envision burns 460 to 460 gallons depending on configuration. Below is what that costs at three pump prices, and how much more the thirstiest configuration costs than the most efficient one.
| Pump price | Most efficient | Thirstiest | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00/gal | $1,380 | $1,380 | $0 |
| $3.50/gal | $1,610 | $1,610 | $0 |
| $4.00/gal | $1,840 | $1,840 | $0 |
EPA’s own estimate for the 2026 model year is $2,500 to $2,500 a year in fuel, or $1,250 more than the average new vehicle over five years.
How it compares with other Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Across the 311 nameplates EPA classifies as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, the median best combined rating is 27 mpg. At 25 mpg the Buick Envision is 2 mpg below the median, which is worth about $119 a year at $3.50 a gallon.
- All Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD rankings — every nameplate in the class, best to worst.
Other Buick nameplates
Every Buick model compared → — all nameplates ranked by best combined rating, with what each one costs a year.